Health & Medical Cancer & Oncology

Assay for ALK Rearrangement in Primary Lung Adenocarcinoma

Assay for ALK Rearrangement in Primary Lung Adenocarcinoma

Results

ALK Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization


One hundred and ninety-six lung ADCs were included in this study, consisting of 108 female and 88 male patients. The mean age is 57.4 years (range, 24–81 years). Of these, 63 (32%, of 196) demonstrated an ALK rearrangement (FISH positive), and 133 cases were FISH negative (Figure 1). The FISH-positive cases included 35 women and 28 men with mean age of 52.5 years (range, 24–76 years). On FISH examination, split pattern was observed in 45 cases (71%) and unbalanced rearrangement, characterized by a loss of the 5' probe, was shown in 18 cases (29%). Twelve cases (6%, of 196) showed average green or orange signals of more than three per cell.



(Enlarge Image)



Figure 1.



Detection of ALK fusion in lung cancer patients by immunohistochemistry (IHC), FISH, and real-time RT–PCR assays. (A–D) Semiquantitative IHC staining using an antibody to ALK (D5F3 by Cell signaling [Billerica, MA] with Ventana Untraview DAB detection kit). (A) score 0/negative showing no staining; (B) score 1+ showing faint cytoplasmic reactivity without any background staining; (C) score 2+ showing moderate smooth cytoplasmic staining; and (D) score 3+ showing intense granular cytoplasmic staining in ≥10% of tumor cells. Original magnification ×200. (E–H) Ventana IHC assay revealed strong expression of ALK in all ALK-fusion-positive patients and no expression in ALK-fusion-negative patient. Original magnification ×200. (I–L) FISH carried out with Vysis LSI ALK Dual color Break-Apart FISH probes detected ALK fusion as split red and green signals. (I) FISH-negative case showing intact two fused signals per nucleus. (J and K) FISH-positive cases representing split (red and green) signals. (L) FISH-positive case demonstrating isolated red signal. Original magnification ×1000. (M–P) Graphs from real-time RT–PCR showing change in the normalized reporter signal (delta Rn) against PCR cycle number for reaction 1 of AmoyDx EML4-ALK fusion gene detection kit.




ALK Immunohistochemistry


All patients with CST by Ultraview IHC score of 2+ or 3+ (n = 50) were Ventana IHC positive and all patients with score of 0 (n = 126) were Ventana IHC negative. Among patients with CST IHC score of 1+, 5 (of 20) were Ventana IHC negative.

ALK Real-time RT–PCR


Using real-time RT–PCR, 69 cases (35%, of 196) were identified to have EML4-ALK rearrangement, including 52 cases of EML4-ALK fusion variants 1/2/3a/b, and 2 cases of variants 5a/5b/5'/8. Fifteen cases were both positive for Variants 1/2/3a/b and variants 5a/5b/5'/8.

correlation of ALK FISH, IHC, and Real-time RT–PCR


As shown in supplementary Table S1, available at Annals of Oncology online, of 50 patients with CST by Ultraview IHC score of 2+ or 3+, 48 (96%) were FISH positive and all patients with score of 0 (n = 126) were FISH negative. Among patients with CST IHC score of 1+, 15 (75.0%, 15 of 20) were FISH positive. The sensitivity and specificity of ALK CST IHC with staining intensity score of 1+ or more were 100% and 95%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of ALK CST IHC with staining intensity score of 2+ or more were 76% and 98%, respectively.

Of 65 patients with Ventana IHC ALK positive, 63 (97%) were FISH positive and all patients with IHC ALK negative were FISH negative. The sensitivity and specificity of ALK Ventana IHC were 100% and 98%, respectively.

Sixty-two (90%, of 69) patients detected as positive by RT–PCR were FISH positive, while 126 (99%, of 127) patients with ALK negative by RT–PCR were FISH negative. The sensitivity and specificity of RT–PCR for detection of ALK fusion were 98% and 95%, respectively.

Of 69 ALK RT–PCR-positive patients, 64 (93%) were Ventana IHC positive, while 126 (99%, of 127) ALK RT–PCR-negative cases were Ventana IHC negative (supplementary Table S2, available at Annals of Oncology online). The total accordance rate between ALK RT–PCR and Ventana IHC was 97%.

The details of discrepant cases for ALK fusion detection among IHC, FISH, and RT–PCR were shown in supplementary Figure S1 and Table S3, available at Annals of Oncology online).

Related posts "Health & Medical : Cancer & Oncology"

Survey of People Treating and Living With Lung Cancer

Cancer & Oncology

Evaluation of the Thyroid Nodule

Cancer & Oncology

Sunburn, UV Overexposure & Skin Cancer - Prevention or Cure?

Cancer & Oncology

What Are Monocytes?

Cancer & Oncology

Radon-References

Cancer & Oncology

Therapies for Melanoma Brain Metastases: Which Drug and When?

Cancer & Oncology

Technology Helps to Diagnose Prostate Cancer

Cancer & Oncology

What is Pleural mesothelioma

Cancer & Oncology

How to Use Surgical Drains After Breast Surgery

Cancer & Oncology

Leave a Comment